Skip to the content
Our Santa Fe River, Inc. (OSFR)
  • About Us
    • About OSFR
    • Advisory Board
    • Bylaws
    • Get To Know The Santa Fe River
    • Our Board of Directors and Executive Director
  • Membership
  • Volunteer
  • News
  • Contact
  • Calendar
  • Resources
    • How you can help
    • Aquifer-Friendly Landscaping
      • Shades of Green- prioritizing tree planting in the winter.
    • Threats to the Santa Fe River
    • Government Contacts
      • Alachua County Environmental Protection Department
      • Find Your Florida House Representative
      • Find Your Florida Senator
      • Find Your U.S. House Representative
      • Find Your U.S. Senator
    • Maps
  • Our Springs and their springsheds
Menu

Make America Polluted Again Starts in Iowa

October 13, 2025 Environmental Threats - Fossil Fuels, Water Quality Threats - Agricultural Fertilizers by OSFR Leave a Comment on Make America Polluted Again Starts in Iowa
nitratesnasty

Florida’s waterways are in bad shape and getting worse.  Other states are also facing similar problems.

Read the original article here in Circle of Blue.

Comments by OSFR historian Jim Tatum.
jim.tatum@oursantaferiver.org
– A river is like a life: once taken,
it cannot be brought back © Jim Tatum


Make America Polluted Again Starts in Iowa

Without controls, water contamination from Big Ag gets steadily worse.
by Keith Schneider August 20, 2025

 

2020 07 17 Michigan Alma farm aerials JGanter DJI 0502 Edit 2500 In: Make America Polluted Again Starts in Iowa | Our Santa Fe River, Inc. (OSFR) | Protecting the Santa Fe River

President Donald Trump’s campaign to carve up federal environmental agencies and paralyze statutes that cleared the air, cleaned U.S. waters, and protected wildlands marks the opening of MAPA, the new era to make America polluted again.

With uncanny speed and premeditated precision, Trump and his Cabinet are cutting budgets, slicing protections from statutes, and pushing thousands of seasoned scientists and resource managers out of the federal government’s principal environmental agencies: the Environmental Protection Agency, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Geological Survey, Department of Agriculture, and Department of the Interior.

Because the ecological systems at risk are dynamic, the consequences – reappearance of smog in cities, dirtier lakes and rivers, vast fish kills, more human disease – will take years to become fully manifest, which is the primary reason that MAPA has attracted remarkably scant resistance.

That needs to change, and fast. A powerful example of just how contaminated and dangerous MAPA will be is already evident in Iowa. Years of poor stewardship, weak enforcement, and political intimidation have yielded grievously contaminated water statewide from pesticides and farm nutrients that fouls creeks and lakes. The mess puts the health of every Iowan in peril – and extends that peril more than 1,200 miles downstream to the Gulf of Mexico. That’s no exaggeration.

The rocket rise of cancer and the diminished condition of Iowa’s water and land are deadly warnings.

More than half of Iowa rivers monitored for water quality  are formally declared as impaired, meaning they are so polluted no new discharges from any industrial source is permitted. Most of Iowa’s recreational lakes develop toxic algal blooms every summer, making them unfit for swimming. Since 2012, Iowa citizens have developed the second highest and fastest rising incidence of cancer among all states.

This summer another ecological shock rocked Iowa when the water authority in Des Moines, the state capital, issued the first mandatory restrictions on water use in its history. The limits came in response to concentrations of nitrates that were more than twice the U.S. safety standard – and the highest since 2013 – in the two rivers that are the sources of drinking water for 600,000 residents.

Almost all of Iowa’s pollution from nitrates – a suspected carcinogen – come from fertilizer spread on farm fields and manure from Iowa’s industrialized hog, cattle, and poultry operations. Iowa agriculture discharges more of both into its waters than any other state.

Keep in mind that Iowa’s citizens and government authorities, like those in every other state, once valued the statutes and agencies that scrubbed the skies, cleared the waters, cleaned up toxic dumps, secured wildlife habitat, and implemented countless other steps to manage their environment. Older Iowans recall clean streams and lakes for fishing and swimming.

How Iowa developed its worst-in-the-nation-water quality is a story of mounting MAPA-like neglect. Decades of political influence exerted by Iowa’s agriculture sector convinced state and local governments, academia, business associations and rural residents that farm production and steadily climbing revenues took precedence over the safety of state waters and the health of Iowa’s more than 3 million residents.

What Trump is pursuing now, just like Iowa did starting in the early years of the century, is a perilously different course in how America manages its natural resources. Trump explained the rationale for MAPA in a statement in April that argued environmental safeguards were “a drag on progress.” By allowing industry to evade regulation and increase polluted discharges to air and water, the statement said, “we can stimulate innovation and deliver prosperity to everyday Americans.”

That’s essentially the logic that over time led to Iowa’s wretched water. Some 30 million of Iowa’s 36 million acres is farmland. Until the late 1970s and 1980s Iowa agriculture encompassed nearly 134,000 farms, most of them much less ecologically damaging 300-acre to 400-acre mixed crop operations with manageable herds of hogs and dairy cows raised in pastures.

Today there are almost 50,000 fewer farms in Iowa. They are much larger, more specialized, more productive, and spread more fertilizer on crops than farms in any other state. Most that raise livestock and poultry keep their animals indoors in mammoth feeding and milking operations that produce roughly 100 billion pounds of raw manure annually.

The transition from smaller producers to industrial-size crop and animal production yielded more corn, soybeans, pork, cattle, and poultry. It also produced a torrent of nitrates and phosphorus that Iowa residents grew modestly concerned about in the century’s first decade when harmful algal blooms began forming in state lakes.

In 2013, the state experienced its first farm nutrient pollution crisis when nitrate levels in the Raccoon River, one of Des Moines’s drinking water sources, reached 24.39 parts per million, more than twice the federal safety standard of 10 ppm.

The presence of such high nitrate levels produced a pulse of activity by important players in Iowa.

The water authority, Des Moines Water Works, managed to bring nitrate levels in drinking water back under the safety limit by blending Raccoon River water with clean water from its other sources.

The State Legislature approved the Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy, led by Iowa State University, to convince and compensate farmers for embracing voluntary pollution prevention practices like not plowing their fields, and planting soil-protecting cover crops and buffers along streams to absorb fertilizer and manure.

In 2015, with state funding, Iowa State and the University of Iowa hired Chris Jones, a chemist, to expand the state’s water-quality monitoring network from 12 monitoring stations to 70.

Also In 2015 Des Moines Water Works sued drainage districts in three upstream counties to halt farms from discharging nutrients into the Raccoon.

As it turned out, none of these steps had any influence on the escalating levels of nitrates and other farm pollutants that drain into state waters.

A federal district judge dismissed the Water Works lawsuit in 2017.

From his perch as director of the Iowa’s water quality monitoring, Jones confirmed that the state nutrient reduction strategy had no effect on farm nutrient discharges to state waters. In one year, a billion pounds of nitrates flowed off Iowa farmland into the Mississippi River, and became the primary cause of the low-oxygen “dead zone” in the Gulf of Mexico.

In 2023, Iowa health authorities startled residents when they reported the state’s second in the nation cancer incidence.

How has Iowa responded to mounting evidence of contamination and cancer? With a MAPA-like back of the hand supported by most state residents. Even as pollution grew worse the governor’s office, Legislature, and  local governments got politically redder.

It’s resulted in some harrowing events. Before it was killed earlier this year, the Legislature spent two years giving serious consideration to a proposal to indemnify chemical companies from lawsuits brought by residents whose health is damaged by exposure to their products. Jones was pushed out of his job in 2023 by influential Republican state senators closely connected to agriculture, and the number of water-quality monitoring stations statewide will be cut to 20 in 2026. In 2024, even Iowa’s cancer research group blamed the state’s rising incidence of malignancies on “binge drinking.”

By opening a new era to make America polluted again, Trump is turning aside half a century of accomplishment on protecting natural resources and public health. The rocket rise of cancer and the diminished condition of Iowa’s water and land are deadly warnings. Unless there is powerful public pushback, what’s happened in Iowa will occur in all other states.

Featured Image: The headwaters of the Cedar River, which flows 338 miles from southern Minnesota through Iowa, are choked by algae, the result of excess farm nutrients running off farm fields and from large swine production facilities. Photo © Keith Schneider/Circle of Blue

 

Tags: lack of leadership
Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
OSFR

OSFR

View articles

Our Santa Fe River, Inc is a Florida not-for-profit 501 (c)(3) organization composed of concerned citizens working to protect the waters and lands supporting the aquifer, springs and rivers within the watershed of the Santa Fe River. We do this by promoting public awareness pertaining to the ecology, quality, and quantity of the waters and lands immediately adjacent to and supporting the Santa Fe River, including its springs and underlying aquifer.

You might be interested in …

tally-capitol

TMDLs Are a License to Pollute

December 2, 2022
Read More
Banding rig 1536x1152 1 In: All About Fertilizer at the Price of Plenty | Our Santa Fe River, Inc. (OSFR) | Protecting the Santa Fe River

All About Fertilizer at the Price of Plenty

June 6, 2023
Read More
Fracking Ban In: Old Danger Resurfaces | Our Santa Fe River, Inc. (OSFR) | Protecting the Santa Fe River

Old Danger Resurfaces

April 4, 2024
Read More

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Make Our Voice Louder

Every membership adds volume to our voice so we can get things done. Help us protect the Santa Fe River.

Become a Member

Donate with PayPal

We Are Social

  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Feed

Get in on the Conversation

  • Richard Devereaux on Tipping Points Too Risky to Ignore: ““Walk the Walk” or just “Talk the Talk”? Organic materials comprise about 24% of municipal solid waste in the U.S.A.…” Dec 3, 12:58
  • Phlip Buskirk on Protecting the Polluters: “If a policy consistently places economy above ecology, our water and Earth will be ruined as Deveopers become billionaires.” Nov 20, 11:11
  • James Brown on The Sierra Club Embraced Social Justice. Then It Tore Itself Apart: “Recommended reads: Thomas, Jordan “When It All Burns”. Stewart, Omer, “Forgotten Fires: Native Americans and the Transient Wilderness” Nov 19, 08:09
  • Mary Hampton on The Sierra Club Embraced Social Justice. Then It Tore Itself Apart: “Regarding Sierra Club’s shift of moving toward social justice, I agree with the statement that Our Santa Fe River organization…” Nov 18, 09:51
  • Kristin Rubin on Aftermath Of Ginnie Springs Killings: “It is a sad statement when even one commissioner’s opinion for lax safety requirements be withheld to ensure the safety…” Nov 7, 06:57

About Us

  • Our Santa Fe River, Inc.
  • 2070 SW CR 138, Fort White, FL 32038
  • 352-474-8418
  • A Florida 501(c)(3) Non-Profit Corporation
  • EIN 42-1756985
  • FDACS Registration #CH41570
  • Email Us

Who We Are

Our Santa Fe River, Inc. is a not-for-profit 501-(c)(3) organization incorporated in Florida on December 18, 2007. Our organization is composed of concerned citizens working to protect the waters and lands supporting the aquifer, springs and rivers within the watershed of the Santa Fe River by promoting public awareness pertaining to the ecology, quality, and quantity of the waters and lands immediately adjacent to and supporting the Santa Fe River, including its springs and underlying aquifer.

The Greater Good

https://youtu.be/hDF34vuJN48
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

Our Board of Advisors

Lars Andersen
Mary Jane Angelo
Kathy Fleming
Jim Gross
Thomas Hawkins
Tom Kay
Dr. Bob Knight
Merrillee Malwitz-Jipson
John Moran
Jim D. Pruitt
Pamela Ibanez Smith
Marihelen Wheeler
(c) 2024 Our Santa Fe River, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Web Pump Servers. Web Design. EcoHosting.
Close Menu
    Go to mobile version
    Skip to content
    Open toolbar Accessibility Tools

    Accessibility Tools

    • Increase TextIncrease Text
    • Decrease TextDecrease Text
    • GrayscaleGrayscale
    • High ContrastHigh Contrast
    • Negative ContrastNegative Contrast
    • Light BackgroundLight Background
    • Links UnderlineLinks Underline
    • Readable FontReadable Font
    • Reset Reset
    • SitemapSitemap
    • FeedbackFeedback