Politics and money rule. The USA is certainly not a leader in fighting plastics.
Comments by OSFR historian Jim Tatum.
jim.tatum@oursantaferiver.org
– A river is like a life: once taken,
it cannot be brought back © Jim Tatum
PLASTICS TREATY UNDER THREAT
Oil producer pressure, Trump rollbacks could mar efforts.
GENEVA – Hopes for a “last-chance” ambitious global treaty to curb plastic pollution have dimmed as delegates gather at the United Nations in Geneva for what was intended to be the final round of negotiations.
Diplomats and climate advocates warn that efforts by the EuropeanUnion and small island states to cap virgin plastic production – fueled by petroleum, coal and gas – are threatened by opposition from petrochemical-producing countries and the U.S. administration of President Donald Trump.
Plastic production is set to triple by 2060 without intervention, choking oceans, harming human health and accelerating climate change, according to the OECD.
“This is really our last best chance. As pollution grows, it deepens the burden for those who are least responsible and least able to adapt,” said Ilana Seid, permanent representative of Palau and chair of the Alliance of Small Island States.
A women takes a photo on Aug. 4 in front of the artwork by Canadian artist and activist Benjamin Von Wong titled “The Thinker’s Burden,” a 19-foot-tall sculptural remix of Rodin’s iconic Thinker, which is being created for the Global Plastics Treaty negotiations in front of the United Nations Offices in Geneva.
Delegates will meet officially Aug. 514 for the sixth round of talks, after a meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee in South Korea in late 2024 ended without a path forward on capping plastic pollution.
The most divisive issues include capping production, managing plastic products and chemicals of concern, and financing to help developing countries implement the treaty.
Delegates told Reuters that oil states, including Saudi Arabia and Russia, plan to challenge key treaty provisions and push for voluntary or national measures, hindering progress toward a legally binding agreement to tackle the root cause of plastic pollution.
Government spokespeople for Saudi Arabia and Russia were not immediately available for comment.
Environmental Law, a nonprofit providing legal counsel to some countries attending the talks, said oil states were questioning even basic facts about the harm to health caused by plastics.
“We are in a moment of revisionism, where even science is highly politicized,” he said.
The U.S. State Department told Reuters it will lead a delegation supporting a treaty on reducing plastic pollution that doesn’t impose burdensome restrictions on producers that could hinder U.S. companies.
A source familiar with the talks said the U.S. seeks to limit the treaty’s scope to downstream issues like waste disposal, recycling and product design.
It comes as the Trump administration rolls back environmental policies, including a longstanding finding on greenhouse gas emissions endangering health.
Over 1,000 delegates, including scientists and petrochemical lobbyists, will attend the talks, raising concerns among proponents of an ambitious agreement that industry influence may create a watered-down deal focused on waste management, instead of production limits.
The petrochemical industry said it continues to support a global treaty and has been urging the U.S. administration and Congress to “lean in” in negotiations.
Stewart Harris, spokesperson for the International Council of Chemical Associations, said the U.S. in particular has an opportunity “not just at the negotiating table, but really on the implementation of the agreement” to promote the use of new technologies in mechanical recycling and advanced recycling, which turns plastic waste into fuels, plastics and other products, globally.
Republican and Democratic U.S. lawmakers sent separate letters to Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Aug. 4 pushing for divergent approaches.
A group of House of Representatives Republicans led by Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas, urged the U.S. delegation to push for a treaty that focuses on expanding recycling technology, while a group of Senate Democrats led by Sen. Jeff Merkely of Oregon pushed for a deal that includes plastic production caps.
Two-thirds of the Senate is needed to ratify a treaty.
Island states vulnerable
Small island states are particularly impacted by plastic waste washing ashore, threatening their fishing and tourism economies.
They stress an urgent need for dedicated international funding to clean up existing pollution.
“Plastics are a concern for human health because (plastic) contains about 16,000 chemicals, and a quarter of these are known to be hazardous to human health,” said Dr. Melanie Bergmannof the AlfredWegener Institute in Germany.
Jodie Roussell, global public affairs lead at food giant Nestle and a member of a 300-company coalition backing a treaty to reduce plastic pollution, told Reuters that harmonizing international regulations on packaging reduction and sustainable material use would be the most cost-effective approach.
French politician Philippe Bolo, a member of the global Interparliamentary Coalition to End Plastic Pollution, said that a weak, watered-down treaty that focuses on waste management must be avoided.
Bolo and a diplomatic source from a country attending the talks said the potential of a vote or even a breakaway agreement among more ambitious countries could be explored, as a last resort.
Inger Andersen, executive director of the United Nations Environment Program, however, said countries should push for a meaningful pact agreed by consensus.
‘We’re not here to get something meaningless … you would want something that is effective, that has everybody inside, and therefore everybody committed to it,’ she said.
